By David DePuy (originally published 10/27/2015)
The Collaborative Law Alliance of New Hampshire’s (CLANH) annual meeting was held at McLane Middleton on September 17, 2015. The firm is a big supporter of CLANH’s work, and are proud to have been able to host the event again this year.
As part of the event, attorney Honey Hastings was recognized with the John Cameron award. We congratulate Honey and appreciate her continued dedication to the collaborative law movement.
By David DePuy (originally published 1/5/2015)
Divorce is really a two step process. The second step is the ultimate resolution of all issues on a permanent, basis, either following a trial or by agreement, as to all issues involved, including property division, alimony, child support and parenting issues.It is the first step of divorce proceedings involving temporary matters where the parties can easily go astray. Continue reading
By David DePuy (originally published 4/24/2014)
When you tie the knot in New Hampshire (or anywhere), there are certain rights and responsibilities that are imposed upon you and your spouse by law. Those legal obligations are, in effect, default provisions in the event you and your intended have not provided otherwise by agreement. Instead of having your marital rights and responsibilities determined by the State according to laws passed by the State Legislature that apply to everyone, couples entering into marriage may instead determine their rights and responsibilities in an agreement written by them. Such prenuptial agreements may address almost any matter the parties wish, other than their rights and obligations with regard to children.
By David DePuy (originally published 3/13/2014)
The New Hampshire Supreme Court, in a landmark decision (In Re: Estate of Richard B. Wilber), has confirmed that agreements made between spouses after marriage are valid and enforceable in New Hampshire. The questionable validity of agreements determining rights of each spouse in property of the other upon death or divorce has now been laid to rest. The Court in the Wilber case followed the trend of other states which recognize such agreements, finding that they are, in essence, subject to the same requirements as agreements entered into by parties prior to marriage, so-called prenuptial agreements. Continue reading